athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25
athena25Mr Justice Eady said the blog contained opinions on a number of social and political issues relating to the police and the administration of justice. He added "Night Jack" had expressed strong opinions on matters of political controversy and had also criticised a number of ministers. The judge said the blogger had known he risked disciplinary action if his employers found out one of its officers was communicating to the public in such a way. (Source, Beeb)
Yes, he risked disciplinary action and he got it. Unfortunate, but it happened. That's not the point. The point is that the work has now been removed, and he himself has been publically unmasked. Bloggers beware - those pseudonyms are not protected by law. The public have a "right" to know exactly who you are.
I have no doubt that any number of police officers face disciplinary action without judges deciding that their names and faces should be made known to all. The reason that this guy was named and shamed is because unlike arresting black people on suspiscion of having a car or tasering folk who are already on the ground, writing an internet blog which criticises police procedure is not something likely to be supported by the thin blue line. Not because it was in the public interest to know.
In fact, I'd argue that the public either a) didn't give a shit or b) were quite happy that he remained anonymous - that air of cool and mystery is sometimes all us bloggers have to cling to in order to maintain readership. No, it was in the interest of the police force to unmask him, in order to silence him. A heavy handed form of censorship.
athena25
athena25But first, read this:
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=2
Now go!
athena25![]() |
You are viewing Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |