Of all the places that one might find an article suggesting that the
Arts Council should be trimmed,
Liberal Conspiracy was the last place I'd look. And yet, there it is. I'm angry. Not just at the tripe splurged on the page by someone with the artistic understanding of a block of tesco value chedder, I'm angry at the tone of the piece, I'm angry at the misrepresentation of "facts". I'm angry at the phrase "if it is of high quality it will stand on its own merits" because popularity and commercial viability is the only way of judging whether something is "good". To me, this is the equivalent of saying that if someone is clever enough they will not need a school or training to be able to become a doctor or that if someone is fast enough they will naturally become an olympic athelete without any sort of coaching. Let's not even go into the fact that something cannot stand on its own merit if no-one knows it exists and marketing costs money.
But more than anything, I'm angry at the context.
Yeah, I'm a grown-up (mostly). I accept that just because you call yourself a liberal and I call myself a liberal does not mean that we automatically share the exact same values. I like Kula Shaker for a start and I know a lot of people can't really get behind that. But I do take it to mean that we at least exist in the same sphere of opinions. You know, free healthcare good, bombing people so we can nick their oil bad. That sort of thing. We might disagree on how we go about these things, or the priority of one versus the other. But we should at least be able to nod along to the headlines then bicker about the footnotes in the pub.
This kind of article is just unacceptable. I'd expect it of the Mail or the Telegraph, or one of those pseudo libertarian wankerish bits of prose that assumes just because they had all the advantages that everyone else does to, and that if other people can't succeed with just elbow grease and a british stiff upper lip then
they aren't trying hard enough.
Fuck you.
Seriously.
As if it wasn't difficult enough working in the arts without our own bloody side having a go at us. We're hemorrhaging money to the Olympics, other sources of funding are down due to the recession and people have less cash in their pockets and/or have no jobs so when they do come to see art they want it either free or at a big reduction. But stuff costs the same, if not more. It costs the same to buy wood to make sets, to buy paper to photocopy scripts, for heating, lighting and to pay staff to show you to your seat. And you need this money upfront. So, unless you have Mummy or Daddy's bottomless bank account, you need the Arts Council.
For all its ills, ACE provides a valuable resource for arts professionals in the UK. Being very blunt, without ACE neither my job nor the organisation I work for would exist. No National Theatre either. Government funding is also vital for access - take
free museum entry, for example. How awesome is that? Pretty damn awesome. ACE funding keeps ticket prices down. Fact. Which means that folk like you and me can go and see stuff without taking out a mortgage.
Or you know, let's all just hang up our coats and go back to a dodgy system of patronage were artists were the lickspittles of the wealthy and priviliged and churned out any number of sycophantic plays or dull as dishwater portraits of Sir I Don't Know Much About Art But I Know I Like Big Pictures Of Me.